The mitigation of flood risks in vulnerable coastal regions has become an increasingly critical challenge due to the impacts of climate change. We learned this the hard way… Coastal communities worldwide are facing the dual threats of rising sea levels and more frequent extreme weather events, which can overwhelm existing flood defenses. In response, natural-based solutions like managed realignment (MR) projects are gaining prominence as a cost-effective approach to enhancing coastal protection.
MR involves strategically relocating seawalls and dikes landward to create intertidal wetland habitats, such as salt marshes. These natural features can help attenuate storm surges and waves, potentially reducing the need for costly hard engineering solutions. However, the effectiveness of MR in mitigating flood risks is not always well understood, leading to a lack of trust from local communities. Overcoming this trust deficit is crucial for the successful implementation of MR and other nature-based flood control measures.
The key to optimizing the flood protection potential of MR and similar solutions lies in a collaborative, co-design approach that integrates scientific expertise with community engagement. By involving local stakeholders in all stages of the project development process, from conceptual design to post-implementation monitoring, we can create flood control systems that are both environmentally sustainable and socially accepted.
Quantifying the Flood Mitigation Potential of Coastal Wetlands
The argument for using natural coastal wetlands to mitigate flood risks is well-established in the scientific literature. Wetlands, such as salt marshes and mangroves, can reduce the impacts of coastal flooding through two primary mechanisms:
-
Vertical Accretion: Wetlands naturally build up sediment, allowing them to keep pace with rising sea levels and maintain their protective elevation. This negates the need for costly seawall reinforcements or frequent heightening.
-
Wave Attenuation: The vegetation in wetlands creates surface roughness that dissipates wave energy, reducing the risk of overtopping and erosion of flood defenses.
Studies have shown that natural salt marshes can attenuate wave heights by 12-20% over a 40-meter stretch and reduce storm surge levels by 1.7-70 cm per km of marsh width. These benefits make coastal wetlands a valuable asset for flood risk management, especially in areas where historic land reclamation has increased vulnerability.
Challenges in Translating Wetland Benefits to Managed Realignment Projects
While the flood protection services of natural wetlands are well-documented, the effectiveness of managed realignment (MR) projects in mitigating coastal floods is less certain. MR sites often have a semi-enclosed, engineered design that differs from natural wetlands, potentially altering their hydrodynamics and reducing their capacity to attenuate waves and surges.
Specifically, the size, shape, and tidal exchange characteristics of MR sites can significantly impact their flood protection function. Smaller MR schemes or those with restricted tidal flow may even amplify water levels during extreme events, rather than reducing them. This uncertainty around the flood mitigation potential of MR has contributed to a lack of trust from local communities, hindering their widespread adoption.
To address these challenges, a deeper understanding of the site-specific hydrodynamics within MR schemes is needed, as well as a more collaborative approach to project development that meaningfully engages stakeholders. By integrating scientific expertise and community knowledge, we can design MR and other nature-based flood control solutions that optimize their protective capacity while meeting the needs and concerns of affected populations.
Co-Designing Effective Flood Barriers through Stakeholder Engagement
The successful implementation of flood control projects, especially those involving nature-based solutions, requires a shift away from traditional top-down, expert-driven approaches. Instead, a co-design process that brings together scientists, engineers, and local stakeholders can lead to more effective and socially accepted outcomes.
Co-design is a collaborative method that empowers communities to actively participate in all stages of the project life cycle, from problem definition to design, implementation, and monitoring. This approach recognizes that local knowledge and values are essential for creating solutions that address the unique needs and concerns of each community.
In the context of MR and other flood control measures, a co-design process could involve the following steps:
-
Establish Stakeholder Relationships: Identify and connect with relevant community groups, businesses, and organizations that will be impacted by the flood control project. Build trust and understanding through open communication.
-
Define Project Goals: Engage stakeholders in defining what a “successful” flood control project would entail, accounting for their priorities and concerns. This could include flood risk reduction, habitat restoration, public access, or other community benefits.
-
Co-Develop Design Scenarios: Work with stakeholders to brainstorm and evaluate different flood control design options, such as varying the size, configuration, and tidal exchange characteristics of an MR site. Use scientific modeling to assess the flood mitigation potential of each scenario.
-
Iterative Refinement: Continuously refine the project design based on stakeholder feedback and new scientific insights. This back-and-forth exchange allows the community to shape the final outcome and increase their investment in the project’s success.
-
Collaborative Monitoring: Involve stakeholders in post-implementation monitoring to track the project’s performance and make adjustments as needed. This ongoing collaboration builds trust and can identify unforeseen issues or unintended consequences.
By adopting a co-design approach, flood control projects can leverage the complementary strengths of scientific expertise and community knowledge. This collaborative process not only enhances the technical effectiveness of the flood control measures but also increases the likelihood of long-term community support and acceptance.
Optimizing Flood Barrier Performance Through Co-Design
The co-design of flood control solutions, such as MR projects, can lead to significant improvements in their ability to mitigate coastal flood risks. Here are some key ways that the integrated expertise of scientists, engineers, and local stakeholders can optimize the performance of flood barriers:
Tailored Site Design: By involving stakeholders in the design process, the specific needs and constraints of a local community can be better addressed. For example, the size, configuration, and tidal exchange characteristics of an MR site can be adjusted to balance flood protection, habitat restoration, and community access.
Enhanced Flood Modeling: The co-design approach allows for the integration of local knowledge and observations into the scientific modeling of hydrodynamics and wave attenuation within flood control systems. This can lead to more accurate predictions of a project’s flood mitigation potential.
Increased Community Trust: The collaborative nature of co-design helps to build trust between project proponents and local stakeholders. This trust is crucial for overcoming the common perception that nature-based solutions are less reliable than traditional hard engineering approaches.
Adaptive Management: Co-design facilitates an ongoing dialogue between scientists, engineers, and the community. This allows for the monitoring of project performance and the incorporation of lessons learned to continually improve the flood control system over time.
Multifunctional Benefits: When community priorities are included in the design process, flood control projects can be optimized to provide additional co-benefits, such as recreational opportunities, habitat restoration, and improved aesthetic value.
By embracing a co-design approach, flood control specialists can work collaboratively with local stakeholders to create innovative, sustainable, and socially accepted solutions that enhance coastal resilience. This collaborative model represents a significant advancement over traditional top-down approaches, positioning communities as active partners in the fight against the growing threat of coastal flooding.
Conclusion
As the impacts of climate change continue to intensify, the need for effective and community-supported flood control measures has never been greater. Managed realignment and other nature-based solutions offer a promising pathway for enhancing coastal resilience in a cost-effective and environmentally sustainable manner.
However, realizing the full potential of these innovative approaches requires a fundamental shift in how flood control projects are developed and implemented. By adopting a co-design process that integrates scientific expertise with community engagement, flood control specialists can create flood barrier systems that are optimized for both technical performance and social acceptance.
Through collaborative efforts that bring together engineers, scientists, and local stakeholders, we can design flood control solutions that not only protect vulnerable communities but also enhance their overall quality of life. This collaborative model represents a critical step forward in the ongoing battle against the growing threat of coastal flooding.
Learn more about innovative flood control strategies and community engagement approaches at Flood Control 2015.
Tip: Regularly inspect and maintain flood barriers and drainage systems
